Genuine 3-bed pattern
- Three usable bedrooms
- Similar total area
- Similar design or plot type
- Comparable lower band nearby
Street comparison
Compare nearby 2-bed, 3-bed, and 4-bed homes of the same type. The goal is a clear review question, not a public accusation.
Core question
What to collect
Use the same fields for every property so the pattern is easier to review.
| Field | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Address | Identifies the comparable property. |
| Property type | Terrace, semi-detached, detached, or flat. |
| Developer house type | Shows whether homes share the same design. |
| Advertised bedrooms | Shows the public narrative. |
| Measured smallest room | Shows the box-room evidence point. |
| Council Tax band | Shows the official band being questioned. |
| Sale price and date | Helps compare market treatment over time. |
| Listing or floorplan source | Preserves where the bedroom claim came from. |
Worked example
This is a sample only. Use it to understand the evidence shape, not as a promise that a review will succeed.
A home is marketed as 4 bedrooms. The smallest room measures 2.45m by 2.05m. A stair box takes away about 0.35 m2 of usable floor area.
The room is below common single-room benchmarks used as context. The next question is whether similar 3-bed homes nearby have comparable layout, size, sale evidence, and a lower band.
Careful summary wording: "The smallest room appears unusually limited when compared with the advertised bedroom count and nearby similar homes. I am asking for the banding evidence to be reviewed. I understand the reviewing body decides the outcome."
Community effect
If one house of the same design is reviewed and the band changes, similar houses nearby may have a stronger reason to ask for review. Each property still depends on its own facts, effective date, and comparables.